Committed to improving the health and well-being of all people across every state.

State Opioid Settlement Spending Decisions: North Carolina

This information was compiled based on information from publicly available legislation, state memorandums or executive orders, state websites, and press releases, as well as supplemental interviews with state officials with a role in administering opioid settlement funding.

It offers a snapshot of settlement spending and priorities at the state level (e.g., funding administered by state agencies or designated statewide abatement funds) as well as laws, agreements, and processes that the state has established for allocating funds. NASHP does not track spending at the local or county level, but includes any relevant state-level reports or dashboards that capture local spending within a state. For details on the definitions used here, check out the definitions at the bottom of this page. You can also get an overview of opioid settlement decisions in all states.

Settlement Spending Status

Background

While the majority of North Carolina’s settlement funding is appropriated directly to county and municipal governments, the remaining 15 percent is appropriated by the state General Assembly to distribute for statewide opioid abatement projects. CORE-NC, a collaboration between the Department of Justice, Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), the North Carolina Association of County Commissions, and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Injury Prevention Research Center, helps to support transparency and technical assistance efforts related to settlement spending at both the state and local levels. 

Has the state awarded settlement funds?

Yes. Awards from the state’s portion of settlement funding were announced to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and the University of North Carolina (UNC) for fiscal years 2023–2024 and 2024–2025. The state’s settlement website highlights specific programs that each organization will fund with its allocations. UNC allocations will be used as grant opportunities for opioid abatement research and development projects and a study on recovery courts, while DHHS allocations will fund a variety of local nonprofits and counties. 

Has the state announced priorities or recommendations for spending?

No publicly available information.

Previous spending details

The CORE-NC site stores information on previous year’s settlement allocations, beginning in fiscal year 2021.  

Statewide reporting of local spending

The majority of North Carolina’s settlement funding goes to local governments. The state’s opioid settlement site features robust data from localities receiving settlement funding, including a past spending dashboard reflecting specific abatement strategies funded by localities and a planned spending dashboard reflecting strategies that localities plan to fund.

 

State Settlement Website or Dashboard

Process for Settlement Disbursement

Legislation requires the state share of settlement funding to be allocated by the General Assembly.

State and Political Subdivision Split

Structure

Locally Controlled (>50 percent of funding controlled by cities and/or counties)

Allocation Formula

15 percent state, 80 percent abatement funds established by local governments, 5 percent County Incentive Fund

Role of Advisory Committee

Not applicable.

State Annual Report

Not applicable.

State Overviews

Explore each state's settlement spending progress and priorities, as well as available information on settlement-related laws, agreements, reports, and spending dashboards. Use the dropdown below to see details for each state. You can also see an overview of opioid settlement decisions in all states.

Awarded settlement funds: A designated state agency or statewide opioid abatement fund has published its intention to allocate a dollar amount to a specific abatement program, activity, strategy, service, or support OR an appropriation of settlement funds has been made through a legislative process. Due to the nature of budgeting and procurement processes, this funding could be in the process of being budgeted, obligated, expended, or disbursed.

Published general priorities or recommendations to guide spending: A state agency, abatement council, or advisory council has published priority areas of focus or recommended strategies to address the opioid crisis with settlement dollars but may or may not have allocated settlement funding yet.

Statewide reporting of local spending: NASHP will not be tracking every spending example at the local level, but this category includes states that have published dashboards or reports that include local expenditures.

Search

Sign Up for Our Weekly Newsletter

* indicates required
Please enter a valid email address.
Areas of Interest