Committed to improving the health and well-being of all people across every state.

State Opioid Settlement Spending Decisions: Connecticut

This information was compiled based on information from publicly available legislation, state memorandums or executive orders, state websites, and press releases, as well as supplemental interviews with state officials with a role in administering opioid settlement funding.

It offers a snapshot of settlement spending and priorities at the state level (e.g., funding administered by state agencies or designated statewide abatement funds) as well as laws, agreements, and processes that the state has established for allocating funds. NASHP does not track spending at the local or county level, but includes any relevant state-level reports or dashboards that capture local spending within a state. For details on the definitions used here, check out the definitions at the bottom of this page. You can also get an overview of opioid settlement decisions in all states.

Settlement Spending Status

Background

The Connecticut Opioid REsponse (CORE) team, which includes members of Yale schools of medicine and public health, updated recommendations from a previous CORE report originally published in 2016 to highlight the state’s new priorities for addressing the opioid crisis. CORE recommendations intend to inform and assist in timeliness of settlement allocation decisions made by the Connecticut Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee (OSAC), which is responsible for ensuring appropriate allocations of state settlement funding. 

Has the state awarded settlement funds?

Yes. A recent update from the state’s Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee outlined initiatives that have been approved across the categories of treatment, harm reduction, prevention, and recovery support. Example initiatives include mobile opioid treatment programs, harm reduction vending machines, a public awareness and education campaign, and supportive housing, among others. Each initiative links to more details about the funded program. 

Has the state announced priorities or recommendations for spending?

Yes. The Connecticut Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee received an updated priorities report from the Connecticut Opioid REsponse (CORE) team highlighting seven priorities to guide the advisory committee as it makes initial disbursements of settlement funding. Alongside each priority is the rationale and evidence for it being chosen, strategies for specific investments, and potential goals that would arise from investing in these strategies. Some of the priorities include increasing access to medication for opioid use disorder, improving data sharing, and addressing social determinants of at-risk populations. 

Previous spending details

Not applicable. 

Statewide reporting of local spending

The Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee published a Municipal Settlement Proceeds Report, which summarizes the over $2 million expended so far by cities and towns receiving settlement funding from the local jurisdiction share. Each municipality submitted information on abatement funds received and expended, collaborating municipalities, and program plans.

State Settlement Website or Dashboard

Spending Plans and Agreements

Process for Settlement Disbursement

Legislation creates an Opioid Settlement Fund to hold the state share of settlement funding and grants the power to administer the fund to the Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee. Disbursements are formally made by the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services.

State and Political Subdivision Split

Structure

Abatement-Fund Controlled (>50 percent of funding controlled by statewide abatement fund)

Allocation Formula

85 percent to state Opioid Settlement Fund, 15 percent to local jurisdictions

Role of Advisory Committee

The Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee has decision-making authority over state settlement funding. The commissioner of mental health and addiction services serves as the chair of the committee but cannot overrule or deviate from committee’s decisions.

State Annual Report

Not applicable.

State Overviews

Explore each state's settlement spending progress and priorities, as well as available information on settlement-related laws, agreements, reports, and spending dashboards. Use the dropdown below to see details for each state. You can also see an overview of opioid settlement decisions in all states.

Awarded settlement funds: A designated state agency or statewide opioid abatement fund has published its intention to allocate a dollar amount to a specific abatement program, activity, strategy, service, or support OR an appropriation of settlement funds has been made through a legislative process. Due to the nature of budgeting and procurement processes, this funding could be in the process of being budgeted, obligated, expended, or disbursed.

Published general priorities or recommendations to guide spending: A state agency, abatement council, or advisory council has published priority areas of focus or recommended strategies to address the opioid crisis with settlement dollars but may or may not have allocated settlement funding yet.

Statewide reporting of local spending: NASHP will not be tracking every spending example at the local level, but this category includes states that have published dashboards or reports that include local expenditures.

Search

Sign Up for Our Weekly Newsletter

* indicates required
Please enter a valid email address.
Areas of Interest