Committed to improving the health and well-being of all people across every state.

State Opioid Settlement Spending Decisions: Alabama

This information was compiled based on information from publicly available legislation, state memorandums or executive orders, state websites, and press releases, as well as supplemental interviews with state officials with a role in administering opioid settlement funding.

It offers a snapshot of settlement spending and priorities at the state level (e.g., funding administered by state agencies or designated statewide abatement funds) as well as laws, agreements, and processes that the state has established for allocating funds. NASHP does not track spending at the local or county level, but includes any relevant state-level reports or dashboards that capture local spending within a state. For details on the definitions used here, check out the definitions at the bottom of this page. You can also get an overview of opioid settlement decisions in all states.

Settlement Spending Status

Background

Alabama’s Oversight Commission on Opioid Settlement Funds is tasked with recommending expenditures from the state’s share of settlement funding and monitoring expended funds. The commission works in addition to the Alabama Opioid Overdose and Addiction Council, which published a 2024 annual report that included state priorities for opioid abatement investments and details regarding appropriations from the state settlement fund. 

Has the state awarded settlement funds?

Yes. Recently passed legislation appropriated $41 million from the state settlement fund to a variety of organizations. The largest sum ($27.86 million) went to the Department of Mental Health for a variety of initiatives, including for grants, Medicaid state match, a 988 crisis line, and co-occurring civil commitment beds, among other projects. Other allocations award state agencies, such as the Department of Public Health, Office of Prosecution Services, and Department of Forensic Sciences, for a variety of projects, and universities for expansion of substance use training and residency programs.  

Has the state announced priorities or recommendations for spending?

Yes. The 2023 Annual Report details eight recommended priorities of the Opioid Overdose and Addiction Council. Each priority is led by a standing committee within the council — some example priorities include supporting treatment systems that include culturally appropriate services, efforts to prevent or reduce overdose deaths, and developing state-level recovery friendly and supportive workplace resources.

Previous spending details

The Alabama Overdose and Addiction Council’s previously published annual reports, which detail settlement allocations from previous years, can be found on the council’s site. Additionally, the Oversight Commission’s site details previous awardees from the Department of Mental Health’s grant programs supported by settlement funds.  

Statewide reporting of local spending

Not applicable.

Spending Plans and Agreements

Process for Settlement Disbursement

The state legislature appropriates settlement funds annually and can use the recommendations of the Oversight Commission on Alabama Opioid Settlement Funds and the Alabama Overdose and Addiction Council, which was established prior to these settlements.

State and Political Subdivision Split

Structure

Split (no institution controls more than 50 percent of funds)

Allocation Formula

50 percent state, 50 percent political subdivisions

Role of Advisory Committee

The Oversight Commission on Alabama Opioid Settlement Funds develops a statewide plan for the investment and use of opioid settlement funds and reviews expenditures.

State Overviews

Explore each state's settlement spending progress and priorities, as well as available information on settlement-related laws, agreements, reports, and spending dashboards. Use the dropdown below to see details for each state. You can also see an overview of opioid settlement decisions in all states.

Awarded settlement funds: A designated state agency or statewide opioid abatement fund has published its intention to allocate a dollar amount to a specific abatement program, activity, strategy, service, or support OR an appropriation of settlement funds has been made through a legislative process. Due to the nature of budgeting and procurement processes, this funding could be in the process of being budgeted, obligated, expended, or disbursed.

Published general priorities or recommendations to guide spending: A state agency, abatement council, or advisory council has published priority areas of focus or recommended strategies to address the opioid crisis with settlement dollars but may or may not have allocated settlement funding yet.

Statewide reporting of local spending: NASHP will not be tracking every spending example at the local level, but this category includes states that have published dashboards or reports that include local expenditures.

Search

Sign Up for Our Weekly Newsletter

* indicates required
Please enter a valid email address.
Areas of Interest