Quality and Performance Measurement

Based on interviews with state and hospital officials, professional boards, providers, consumer representatives, and purchasers, this report places mandatory reporting within the context of current state and federal hospital oversight activity. It provides detailed information about how eight state-based mandatory hospital reporting programs came into existence, how these programs are operated, the associated legal issues, […]

Read More
  • Publications

    This report explores data issues associated with mandatory reporting systems, potential interactions between mandatory reporting and malpractice litigation, the potential uses of publicly available mandatory reporting system data, and arguments for and against protections for such data.   Click here to download the zipped pdf file.  

    Read More
    April 17, 2009 | Filed under: Publications, Quality and Performance Measurement
  • Publications

    This paper examines the costs of designing and implementing a state-based mandatory reporting system for adverse events that occur within hospitals. The paper begins with a brief review of the Institute of Medicine’s study on medical errors and its recommendations regarding the role of states in addressing the issue. This is followed by a summary […]

    Read More
    April 17, 2009 | Filed under: Publications, Quality and Performance Measurement
  • Publications

    This comprehensive workbook provides a step-by-step guide to help state policy makers build or redesign a mandatory reporting system. The workbook provides an overview of the various policy goals and considerations that frame states’ mandatory reporting systems. It is designed to enable states to learn from the success of other states and, at the same […]

    Read More
    April 17, 2009 | Filed under: Publications, Quality and Performance Measurement
  • Publications

    This report was developed to help policy makers develop, refine, and clarify mandatory reporting systems and potentially to compare their data nationally. The guide includes a comparison of the National Quality Forum’s (NQF) list of serious reportable events to existing state reporting systems and discusses further steps recommended by states to support the use and […]

    Read More
    April 17, 2009 | Filed under: Publications, Quality and Performance Measurement
  • Publications

    This paper explores how data from mandatory reporting systems are (or can be) disclosed to the public. Based upon detailed interviews with states that have mandatory reporting systems, NASHP identified critical junctures in the design of reporting systems that influence the ultimate use of data. By examining and mapping out these critical junctures, the parameters […]

    Read More
    April 17, 2009 | Filed under: Publications, Quality and Performance Measurement
  • This policy brief addresses the issues raised by the convergence of medical error reporting and the fear of medical malpractice litigation. It discusses how states protect data with the intention of increasing the compliance level of reporting, examines a sample state protection statute, and explores recent proposals for alternatives that would address the reluctance of […]

    Read More
    April 17, 2009 | Filed under: Quality and Performance Measurement
  • Publications

    This report reviews key findings from a meeting of data collectors (state officials who administer reporting systems), analysts (state officials or consultants to them), and users (providers, purchasers, and consumers). The meeting was held to identify mechanisms to improve reporting, tools used for event report analysis and dissemination, and opportunities for improvement. This report reviews […]

    Read More
    April 17, 2009 | Filed under: Publications, Quality and Performance Measurement
  • Publications

    Since the Institute of Medicine called for a nationwide, mandatory reporting system to provide for the collection by state governments of standardized information about adverse medical events, much state activity has focused on the development and refinement of these systems. The information collected can help identify health system weaknesses, complement other state functions, and help […]

    Read More
    April 17, 2009 | Filed under: Publications, Quality and Performance Measurement
  • This brief summarizes the key features of the Drug Effectiveness Review Project (DERP). The DERP is a collaborative partnership between states and other government and non-profit entities that conducts systematic evidence-based reviews of pharmaceuticals. It is the largest effort to apply current best practices and evidence-based analysis to pharmacy management issues. medicaid_DERP.pdf 882.5 KB  

    Read More
    April 17, 2009 | Filed under: Medicaid, Quality and Performance Measurement